Last week, as I read through a scholarly article about social
science-based energy research, I was surprised to see “Gender and Identity” in
the list of promising though underdeveloped research areas. I shouldn’t have
been surprised. While under-appreciated, gender
interacts with energy in many important ways.
Women throughout the world spend hours collecting fuel before
using it for cooking and other chores. Energy
also shapes our practices, cultures, and communities. For example, the article notes how
communal cooking fires can act as havens “where women can gather to discuss
their personal issues without the presence of men.” Of course Schwartz Cowan’s link between technology and
gender roles (see the More Work for
Mother posts) also applies to energy.
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Monday, April 7, 2014
Thursday, November 21, 2013
In Class: Infant and Child Education
I am currently taking a course on Infant and Child development here at school. We've been discussing physical, emotional and cognitive development throughout the semester, but I want to relate a quick blurb from today's discussion.
Topic: Autobiographical Memory
Definition: representations of one-time events that are long-lasting because they are imbued with personal meaning.
Notes on the slide:
I am not a big fan of my teacher, so I bring along my textbook to complement the bland slides and anecdotes. Thus, I quickly skimmed the page for the relevant information. It says here in the book:
"These differences fit with variations in parent-child conversations. Parents reminisce in greater detail and talk more about the emotional significance of events with daughters."
However, instead of sharing this fascinating fact, our teacher asks the class why this might be so. She basically ends up saying it was attributable to the fact that girls like to gossip more. Girls like to talk and share details, even if they have already told/heard the story before.
I am very disappointed. The original concept is very intriguing. To repeat myself: the way parents interact with their children directs how children narrate and what topics they choose to include. Parents help enforce societal norms and focus development from day one.
But what did I leave the class with? A stereotype... girls are good storytellers because they gossip more than boys.
Topic: Autobiographical Memory
Definition: representations of one-time events that are long-lasting because they are imbued with personal meaning.
Notes on the slide:
- Parents help develop narrative
- Girls
usually
better organized, detailed
I am not a big fan of my teacher, so I bring along my textbook to complement the bland slides and anecdotes. Thus, I quickly skimmed the page for the relevant information. It says here in the book:
"These differences fit with variations in parent-child conversations. Parents reminisce in greater detail and talk more about the emotional significance of events with daughters."
However, instead of sharing this fascinating fact, our teacher asks the class why this might be so. She basically ends up saying it was attributable to the fact that girls like to gossip more. Girls like to talk and share details, even if they have already told/heard the story before.
I am very disappointed. The original concept is very intriguing. To repeat myself: the way parents interact with their children directs how children narrate and what topics they choose to include. Parents help enforce societal norms and focus development from day one.
But what did I leave the class with? A stereotype... girls are good storytellers because they gossip more than boys.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)